It has been said that humans can be
attracted to the opposite sex (heterosexual), to the same sex (homosexual), having both these tendencies (bisexuality),
to all gender identities (pansexuality
or bisexuality), or not being attracted to anyone in a sexual manner (asexuality).
Everyone who has ever been born was born of a woman, through the sexual
relationship between that woman and a man. Nobody is ever born of a male man.
Everywoman was created with organs and hormones relevant for receiving seed
from man, getting the seed to fertilize woman’s egg, incubating the seed for a
period of time and delivering the seed.
I have read
articles showing that other forms of sexual orientation besides heterosexual
are research based. Such articles are geared towards mobilizing support for ‘human
right’ for the homosexuals. They try to prove that being a homosexual is also
natural. If they stop at saying that humans can have homosexual tendencies, based
on environmental influences, that may be more agreeable, but to further the
argument by promoting the need to allow such people marry each other is a hard
nut to chew. Who among the homosexuals, can say today that they were given
birth to by male man. Do men have womb? Do women have spermatozoa, do they
produce sperm and transfer to other women. If the response is that they can use
insemination, then they should not get married to achieve that. One major
reason for marriage is procreation; if homosexual partners cannot still achieve
procreation by themselves in marriage, why don’t they stay on their own and
live instead of misapplying marriage.
I grew up knowing
that it was wrong for me to have sexual relations with a woman until I was
married to her. My spiritual background helped me understand that doing
otherwise was sinful. However I did not know that it was possible to feel
sexually attracted to fellow male man. It only dawned on me how dangerous it
was when I was lured into such tendencies as a teenager. The desire to explore
it was strong, but there was no such opportunity to continue in it. I could
have gone deep into it and later claim that that was my natural sexual
orientation. Even the period in my life when I felt such tendency, I still
admired females, but did not want to get close to them for fear of getting
sexually involved.
I have since been
delivered from such tendency, following superior spiritual understanding. I am
married to a woman today and we have wonderful sexual relationship. That is
what I believe is natural. Any attempt to choose other forms of sexual
attractions, is a redefinition of human sexuality and should not be supported
or promoted. In elementary physics, we are taught that unlike charges attract
and like charges repel. If this is scientifically proven, I submit that it is
the same principle that works in human sexuality. Even within human
relationship between male and female, it is often noticed that people of
opposite temperaments attract and even get married, the blend helps homes to be
properly established.
One of the most
powerful gifts God gave to man is the gift of choice. Everyone who parades
themselves as homosexuals today, I believe was introduced to it by certain
circumstances. The power to stay in it or refuse to stay lied within them. They
chose to remain so until they found partners to continue with. What is natural
is that opposite sex attract; same sex attraction is not natural. If unlike
charges attract and it is believed that there is a chemical reaction that
guides human sexual attraction, then the physics principle should be respected
in human sexual attractions.
It is enough to
choose to remain homosexual, but to
force the system to agree with you and make a law to accept you and subtly
compel others to take the same route you have taken should not be accepted. I
do not believe that not legislating for the acceptance of homosexuals is denial
of their rights. If they were convinced that they were living a normal life and
have natural sexual dispositions, they should walk the street like every other
person and not seek special legislation to co-exist. If they have chosen to get
married, they should ordain one of their kinds to be a minister for those in
their sexual orientation and let them have a community. Seeking special
legislation to live in the society is a subtle admittance that homosexuality is
an unnatural sexual disposition. It is the vulnerable groups that enjoy special
legislation, if they are convinced they have natural sexual orientation, they
should not seek exclusive legislation to exist and enjoy their rights.
Value for human
sexuality should include respect for what comes natural in human sexuality.
Taking another route in this case has grave consequences for the future. First
it makes marriage what it is not originally. It makes it just a union of two
individuals who claim to have attraction for each other. It removes the truth
that love in marriage goes beyond erotic love. It also creates confusion to the
children they eventually adopt and those who become friends of such children.
What do you think would be going on in the mind of such children, when they
realize that their mate’s parents are male and female while theirs are either
male and male or female and female?
Talks
Post a Comment